THE Hospitality Association of Zimbabwe (HAZ) says the regularisation of unapproved offshore accounts and unregistered agreements will curb tourism leakages and pave the way for accurate reporting on the tourism satellite account.
The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) recently granted a moratorium to all operators, who have unregistered tourism agreements and unapproved offshore accounts to regularise the agreements and offshore foreign currency accounts with the central bank before the end of this month.
This insinuated that tourism operators were involved in externalisation.
“It is a development that is necessary for compliance and we believe it will also bring in line issues of tourism leakages that do occur,” HAZ president Farai Chimba said.
“This is going to pave the way for accurate reporting on the tourism satellite account to get the true contributions and value for tourism to the country’s gross domestic product.
“The end result is to have correct interventions and policies which will grow tourism for all.”
But Tourism Business Council of Zimbabwe president Wengayi Nhau said they were not involved in externalisation and urged the RBZ to understand how they operate.
“For argument sake, we have a client in Europe or the United States wanting to go on holiday,” he explained to Standardbusiness.
- The Fiddler: The body politic
- Ukraine becoming an international centre for illegal arms trade
- CCC urged to push for dialogue over reforms
- Quality helps Trojan reach Axis Solutions Cup semis
Keep Reading
“Then on the other end, we have a destination management company (DMC) that is, in most cases, based either in that particular destination within the country or they operate remotely.
“And then you have what we call a travel agent and a tour operator.”
“The DMC is more like the supply chain manager. It consolidates all services, manage everything on the ground.
“The tour operator provides a service of taking people for the tours.
“The travel agent does packaging in conjunction with the tour operator and the DMC.
“The travel agent is back in the source market; in this case it's in Europe or the United States.
The travel agent then contacts the local ground handler, which is the DMC in the case of Zimbabwe and asks for services which include accommodation, tours, safari activities, and they are given a quotation based on the rates that we have got locally.”
Nhau said when the travel agents in Europe or the United States check all the costs; they put their own mark-up which the local operators have no control over.
If there is an intermediary in between the overseas client and the regional client, they also put their mark-up.
“I might be dealing with the South African operator, who would be dealing with the Canadian operator or American operator. I give a quotation to the South African operator who put his mark up and give it to the overseas operator who also put their mark up.
“What they transmit and remit to Zimbabwe is only what I've invoiced and we have no control over all other things.”
He added: “So, the bone of contention that has been happening is that with the RBZ and Zimbabwe Revenue Authority in some cases they’ve attempted to also factor in the difference between what the agents have collected and what I have charged.
“We have what we call special tour operators rates. These are contract rates.
“When I book accommodation as an agent in Zimbabwe I get it at less 20%, 15% or 10% depending on what negotiations we have done and when I pass on to this operator, I also give him maybe less 10% or 5% whichever. He puts his mark-up.”
Nhau added: “So, what then the authorities are thinking is that the difference between what we have quoted here and what the client has paid, they take that as externalisation.
“Since these are contracts and as you know we are dealing remotely, people feel secure and safe to pay after the service. In the case of agents and operators, they prefer to pay one invoice.”
He said where the money is paid into the Zimbabwean account, as ground handlers, they also collect payments on behalf of other downstream operators who are outside Zimbabwe’s jurisdiction.
When they receive this bulk payment into the country, they should then be able to forward the payment and keep it as deposit until the time the payment is due we transmit it.
“Our exchange control regulations are very inconsistent to an extent that people no longer feel secure to hold the money for a longer period here because even if we have an account that allows you to hold payments in foreign currency, they have up to 90 days that you must have used that money,” he said.
“But in a lot of cases we hold deposits for 6, 12, 18, 24 months or beyond.
“As we speak, we are running activities and services for payments that were deposited prior to Covid-19 that were interrupted by the pandemic, but where there is that extended control requirement that we must liquidate payment, we become handicapped.”
