Since the beginning of this year, there has been one or two mass shootings per week since January.
Last Saturday, a gunman wearing tactical gear invaded a shopping mall at Allen, Texas, and started shooting, killing among the eight, a five-year-old.
In the same state, at Brownsville, a driver plough into a bus station where migrants from Latin America were waiting to board busses for their destination, killing eight of them.
This makes the incident the 21st since January.
Usually, such shooters, like Garcia Morrico, do research of their victims, write memos, and even make demands, all this aiming at making them immortal in the annals of murder.
That is a dangerous idea. When virtue is no longer pursued, notoriety becomes preferable as a basis for fame.
By far the most notorious schooling was that at Columbine School, Colorado in 1999.
The official report says that the perpetrators, 12th graders Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, had been planning the event for a year.
- Zim to host world boxing indabas
- Hay reveals inspiration behind equestrian career
- Real Madrid win 35th Spanish La Liga title
- Bosso search for elusive away win
Keep Reading
The report also says that there was no clear motive except that there was mention on their Facebook memos of how many minutes on television their story would be allocated.
Ten students were killed in the library where the malefactors eventually committed suicide.
The report mentions subsequent national reflections about moral decline and panic, sparked by American gun culture, high school cliques and gangs, outcasts, increasing use by teenagers of antidepressants (drugs) the internet and violence in video games.
The US state has aided and abetted in the pursuit of new-fangled dangerous ideas, who consequences are ill-considered at the point of origin.
The issue at hand is that as 80% of school going children are either raised by two working parents, or by working single mothers, who have a lessening grip on religious fundamentals, having surrendered authority to social media and television, children are self-raising, in a world of anomie (no boundaries).
In 1965, Bruce Reimer lost his tail from a botched circumcision.
The parents, advised by Dr. John Money of Johns Hopkins University, raised the boy as a girl, injecting female hormones into his body, and succeeding in bringing about a female-like body appearance.
Bruce’s body rejected the female identity at puberty and rediscovered its male origins.
However, though the experiment failed, leading to Bruce’s suicide, it was used by Money and his Frankenstein acolytes to support the theory of gender affirmation.
In layman’s terms, gender affirmation is the idea that if a boy child says that he is a girl, society is obligated to affirm his preferred identity by removing his tail, and through medical surgery, creating a girl.
These Frankenstein monsters choose to ignore the fact that a girl is born with a womb, which cannot be created by human hands.
To understand these false doctrines, editor-in-chief of Academic Renewal, Graham Hillard, was forced to walk the talk when transgender 27-year-old Audrey Hale (she says she is a man) held her schoolteacher wife and child at Covenant School hostages.
When Hillard’s wife alerted him on his cell phone that “there was an active aggressor” in the school building, and that the police may have “neutralised the active shooter” and that parents and learners were being re-assembled at the nearby Baptist Church for “reunification” he realised that old words had now been replaced by new words, whose meanings did not at first add to clarity.
Brought up in the Christian faith, he struggled with the new realities. Was the shooter she or he?
Is it possible that “they” as Hale now preferred pronoun had been trans-gendered from female to male? And by whom?
And yet, this is the official policy of the US government — that “they” Hale must be affirmed in whatever gender “they” wanted to be. Hillard, brought up as a Christian, realised that this new government policy of transgenderism is totally “incompatible with (Christianity) and that to embrace it is to deny the other”.
Hillard searched the scrolls and came upon the heavy sentence by theologian Owen Strachan that: “We are not our own, and we cannot make ourselves whatever we would wish to be”.
Yet, dear readers, US vice president Kamala Harries flies around Africa with a “bunch of money” (US$67 million) to share with whatever government will advance this trans-gender theory.
As we speak, the US State Department has set aside US$500 000 (half a million) for Pakistani trans-gender children who want to learn English. (Source-Siloam Radio)
Zambia’s opposition leader, Fred Mbembe, asks whether now the US has a new missionary gospel, to convert the world into gay populations. This US arrogance can only be compared to their shamelessness.
It is possible that Mbembe may have missed the bigger picture.
Bill Gates of Microsoft worries about Africa’s population growth.
He blames former president Donald Trump for stopping “family planning organisations that offer abortions (in Africa) and access to contraception where women need it most.” (September 18, 2018)
In a memo from the US National Security Council marked confidential, it was emphasised that while the US aims at total reduction of population in Lesser Developed Countries (LDC’s), their spokespersons should avoid mentioning phrases such as “population control” and “contraceptives: which have been found to have reduced the fertility of African women by 10%.
Such words annoy the Roman Catholic church and provoke national feelings of sovereignty in those countries most affected.
Henry Kissinger, in that report (1969) asserted that the natural resources of Africa were indispensable for Western countries.
There is a relationship between population control and exploitation of Africa’s resources outside the continent.
There is a method in their madness, after all.
- Ken Mufuka is a Zimbabwean patriot. He writes from the US. He can be reached at mufukaken@gamil.com.
