THE International Monetary Fund’s recent assessment of Zimbabwe’s economic landscape has brought to the surface the structural deficiencies that extend far beyond the superficial allure of the gold-backed Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) currency.
In what appears to be a recurring pattern in Zimbabwe’s monetary history, the nation’s sixth currency iteration since 2009 is showing familiar signs of distress.
IMF Africa department director Abebe Selassie’s pointed observation that “Sadly, Zimbabwe has gone through these various cycles and the root cause is the lack of confidence, the lack of faith in monetary and fiscal policy”, underscores a crisis of institutional credibility that has plagued the nation for decades.
The contemporary economic malaise facing Zimbabwe can be traced back to the tumultuous period of the early 2000s, when the controversial fast-track land reform programme catalysed a seismic shift in the country's economic foundation.
This watershed moment triggered a cascade of economic disruptions, beginning with the collapse of commercial agriculture, which had historically been the country’s primary foreign currency earner and employer.
The resulting exodus of skilled agricultural expertise, combined with the fragmentation of previously productive farmland, created a structural deficit in the nation’s productive capacity that continues to reverberate through the economy to today.
Keep Reading
- Dual economy Zim’s Achilles heel
- Village Rhapsody: How Zimbabwe can improve governance
- Dual economy Zim’s Achilles heel
- Scrap IMTT to save industry, govt urged
The period between 2003 and 2008 witnessed the emergence of quasi-fiscal activities by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, where the central bank assumed roles far beyond its traditional monetary policy mandate.
This era saw the bank engaging in various non-core activities, from agricultural mechanisation to mining interventions, all funded through excessive money printing.
This departure from orthodox central banking principles laid the groundwork for the hyperinflationary crisis that would eventually peak in 2008, with inflation rates reaching unprecedented levels that effectively destroyed the Zimdollar.
The current economic predicament, marked by a stark disparity between official and parallel market exchange rates, reveals the persistent nature of these deep-seated issues.
The ZiG’s rapid depreciation, despite its gold backing, demonstrates that currency stability cannot be achieved through asset backing alone when fundamental economic imbalances remain unaddressed.
As Selassie astutely noted, “There is a tendency to see the market rate, the exchange rate, as the cause of the problems countries face. In reality, the exchange rate is often the symptom and the root cause of exchange rate weakness tends to be inflation.”
The alarming surge in monthly inflation to 37,2% in October 2024 from 5,8% in September reflects a broader crisis in economic management.
This inflationary spiral is symptomatic of deeper structural inefficiencies, including a severely constrained productive sector, chronic foreign currency shortages and persistent fiscal deficits.
Government’s continued reliance on monetary financing, despite historical lessons, suggests a fundamental disconnect between policy formulation and economic reality.
Zimbabwe’s path to economic regeneration requires a comprehensive overhaul of its institutional framework.
The current governance structure, characterised by overlapping jurisdictions and policy inconsistencies, has created an environment where economic decisions are often influenced by political considerations rather than sound economic principles.
The central bank’s autonomy, though enshrined in legislation, remains practically compromised, as evidenced by its continued acquiescence to government financing demands.
The nation’s external sector challenges are acute, with a persistent current account deficit exacerbated by limited export diversification and an overreliance on primary commodity exports.
The mining sector, despite its potential, remains hampered by policy uncertainty and inadequate infrastructure investment.
Agricultural recovery, crucial for both food security and export earnings, continues to be constrained by unresolved land tenure issues and limited access to finance.
In essence, the reform agenda must extend beyond superficial currency measures to address fundamental structural impediments.
This includes comprehensive public sector reform to enhance fiscal discipline and transparency, strengthening property rights to attract sustainable investment and rebuilding public institutions to restore confidence in governance structures.
The financial sector requires significant restructuring to improve intermediation and reduce the dominance of government securities in bank balance sheets.
The international community’s role, particularly that of multilateral institutions like the IMF, becomes crucial in this context.
However, Zimbabwe’s ability to access international support remains limited by its external debt arrears and the need for comprehensive economic reforms.
As Selassie emphasises, success lies in “going back to brass tacks and needing to address those root causes”, suggesting that sustainable economic recovery requires a fundamental reimagining of Zimbabwe's economic architecture.
Zimbabwe’s economic reconstruction demands a robust approach that addresses both immediate stability concerns and long-term structural reforms.
This includes establishing credible fiscal rules, implementing transparent monetary policy frameworks, resolving the land tenure issue, rebuilding infrastructure and creating a business environment conducive to private sector growth.
Without such comprehensive reforms, the nation risks perpetuating a cycle of currency failures and economic instability that has characterised its recent history.
The government’s commitment to reform must extend beyond rhetorical promises to include concrete action in addressing these fundamental challenges.
This requires political will to implement potentially difficult but necessary reforms, even when they may have short-term political costs.
- Lawrence Makamanzi is a researcher and he writes here in his personal capacity. He is reachable at his email address blmakamanzi@gmail.com or 0784318605.