‘Govt fails resource management transparency test’

By The Standard and Newsday | Nov. 16, 2021 | 2 Min read

This was revealed in a study recently conducted by the Zimbabwe Coalition on Debt and Development (Zimcodd), which stated that public resource management in the country’s 57 districts had not been inclusive of the views of communities or citizens.

BY MIRIAM MANGWAYA

GOVERNMENT has failed to exercise accountability in natural resource management and stakeholder consultations, a new report has revealed.

The Zimcodd public resource management situational report released on Friday further stated that citizens that were part of the sampled population felt that there was no equitable utilisation of public resources in the country, which includes land, minerals, infrastructure such as roads, schools, and hospitals in order to improve the standard of living of the people.

The study also stated that only 10% of the local authorities that were respondents confirmed that citizens in their districts were actually informed about public resource decisions.

“In the 57 districts covered by this situational report, 54% reported that there is no equal and equitable distribution of resource benefits, while 46% were of the view that benefits from public resources are shared equally and equitably though to a lesser extent,” the Zimcodd report read.

“Accordingly, this situational report found out that 50% of sampled districts are not consulted while 50% are sometimes consulted when public resource decisions are made. Only 10% confirmed that citizens in their districts are informed about public resource decisions and 54% districts reported that they are sometimes informed while 36% are not informed on public resource decisions by authorities.”

The study pointed out that there was lack of access to information by communities, which was the leading factor to lack of transparency and accountability on public resource management in the country.

Keep Reading

It said a majority of the respondents in the 57 districts indicated that they had no access to information with regards to public resources in their areas, while 85% of the respondents said they did not have access to information on local resources, resulting in them being excluded from decision-making processes on public resource utilisation.

“Access to public resource information rated poorly on all the variables across all the 57 districts. Transparency and accountability in public resource management can also be determined by the level of citizens’ access to information on how local authorities are raising, allocating and spending public resources,” Zimcodd said.

“In essence citizen’s access to public resources information is generally poor across all districts. There is need for government to uphold section 13(2) of the Constitution which clearly notes that the State must involve people in the formulation and implementation of developmental plans and programmes that affect them.”